Editorial: Seven Years
and Counting Russell Blackford School of Humanities and Social
Science, University of Newcastle, NSW Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Evolution and Technology Journal
of Evolution and Technology - Vol. 25 Issue 2
– September 2015 - pgs 1-2 In January 2008, I was
honored to be appointed as editor-in-chief of The Journal of Evolution and Technology. In December of that year,
we published an editorial in which I set out some reflections on JETÕs illustrious
past and my vision for its future. Seven years later, I am still in the
editorial chair, and IÕm pleased with what weÕve been able to accomplish so far. We have published
thirteen issues on my watch – this will be the fourteenth – all of
them substantial. These include our regular issues and several special issues
that cover such varied topics as machine intelligence, nonhuman personhood, Friedrich
Nietzsche and European posthumanist thought, and the implications of technological
unemployment. I owe thanks to all of the guest editors, peer reviewers, and
others who have helped to make it possible. This notably includes staff and
associated scholars at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies
(IEET), which has been JETÕs publisher since 2004. My particular thanks go to Marcelo
Rinesi (our efficient managing editor) and James Hughes (in his roles as
associate editor, immediate past editor-in-chief, and executive director of
IEET). There is, of course,
always room for improvement, and I hope that we can take the journal to even
higher levels of quality and relevance in the coming years. Our remit
includes all manner of topics relating to the human, or posthuman, future. When JET was founded in
1998 (by Nick Bostrom and David Pearce) the intent was, as described elsewhere
on our website, to provide a home for academically legitimate research on
topics that many existing journals would Ōshun as too speculative, radical, or
interdisciplinary.Ķ The articles published herein are not always contributed by scholars
and scientists currently working within universities, but that is the default expectation.
Irrespective of their authorship, contributions must meet standards of rigor,
scholarship, and originality similar to those of well-established academic
journals. We continue to focus on
an idea that has become familiar and plausible in recent decades, though still controversial.
In its essence, the idea is that our species, Homo sapiens, is about to commence – or perhaps has already
commenced – a new form of evolution. Unlike the mechanisms of change,
diversification, and speciation studied by evolutionary biologists, this is driven
by emerging technologies with the potential to alter human capacities. The idea
merits careful consideration from many scholarly and scientific viewpoints,
including cautious, unsympathetic, or skeptical ones. An advantage of submitting
to JET is that we generally publish articles as they are received,
peer-reviewed, and edited. We need not wait to compile a complete issue, and
this allows a relatively quick turnaround from submission to publication. When
we do experience publishing delays, they are usually during the period between
submission and acceptance. Once an article is accepted for publication, perhaps
after revisions, it is typically published on the site within a week or two. In my December 2008
editorial, I found myself apologizing for a backlog of articles that were then under
consideration. We succeeded in clearing this at the time, but the situation has
waxed and waned in the following seven years, and unfortunately we now find
ourselves with a backlog that has grown quite large. That is partly because
of the challenges in editing such an interdisciplinary journal, where we need
to identify and obtain expert advice from a range of disciplines. It is also,
in part, because of other responsibilities affecting my own life, combined with
our rather stretched resources for coping with the volume of submissions
currently being received. In an effort to catch up, we have decided to close
for submissions until the end of 2015. All articles that were received by the
end of August 2015 are under active consideration, but some authors who were planning
to submit material to us soon might want to try other journals first. When we reopen for
submissions at the beginning of 2016, we expect to be up to date. We will, of
course, continue to welcome high-quality work that fits within the journalÕs
purpose. Meanwhile, the current issue, 25(2), will take shape between now and the
end of 2015. Over the next few months, we will produce another substantial and
engaging issue from material currently in editing or under consideration. |